Populations of planktic foraminifera display "proportionate" coiling (appro
ximately 50% sinistral and dextral individuals given the data at hand) or m
ay have "biased" coiling, in which populations are dominated by either sini
stral or dextral individuals. The major radiations of planktic foraminifera
in the Late Cretaceous, the Paleocene to early Eocene, the middle Eocene,
and the Neogene were each initiated by clades with proportionate coiling bu
t subsequently accumulated sinistral and dextral species over time. Upper M
aastrichtian foraminifera were predominantly dextral, but only the small nu
mber of species with proportionate coiling actually survived the Cretaceous
/Paleogene mass extinction. The first Paleocene species with biased coiling
appeared about four million years after the extinction and gradually came
to represent as much as 50-60% of the tropical species diversity by the lat
est Paleocene. Tropical taxa with biased coiling suffered a second extincti
on in the late early Eocene and renewed a trend toward an increased abundan
ce of species with biased coiling in the middle Eocene.
Our results for the Paleogene reflect a recurring theme in foraminifer evol
ution. In each radiation. once the founding species of a clade developed a
biased-coiling mode, the descendants tended to maintain biased coiling unti
l the extinction of the clade. The iterative evolution of biased coiling ap
pears to represent an example in which a fundamental feature of development
becomes fixed in a clade and inhibits reversion to an ancestral state. App
arently, coiling patterns are heritable in contrast with previous interpret
ations that coiling is environmentally controlled. On evolutionary timescal
es, species with proportionate coiling are less susceptible to extinction t
han species dominated by sinistral or dextral forms. Differential survivors
hip ensures that each radiation is initiated from founders with proportiona
te coiling following mass extinction. Hence, coiling preferences represent
a case where the establishment of an evolutionary trend is caused by drift
away from a "limiting boundary," much like the evolution of large body size
from ubiquitous small ancestors.