Context. The short-term course of pediatric patients after emergency depart
ment (ED) treatment for acute asthma has not been comprehensively documente
d; most previous studies have limited outcomes to ED length-of-stay, hospit
al admission, and relapse.
Objective. To describe symptom persistence, medication use, functional disa
bility, follow-up, and relapse in these children in the 2 weeks after acute
treatment and ED discharge.
Design. Randomly selected, prospective cohort from September 1996 to August
1997; follow-up telephone interviews at 1 and 2 weeks.
Setting. A large, inner-city children's hospital emergency department.
Patients. Random sample of pediatric asthma visits requiring ED treatment b
ut not admission; 457 were eligible, 388 with complete follow-up (85%); fin
al sample included 367 patients after multiple visits deleted.
Main Outcome Measures. Details of symptom persistence, functional disabilit
y, medication use, relapse, and routine follow-up.
Results. Results included significant morbidity: 23% (95% confidence interv
al [CI]: 19, 27) with cough and 12% (95% CI: 9, 15) with wheeze persistent
at 2 weeks; 20% (95% CI: 16, 24) with decreased activity at 1 week; 45% (95
% CI: 39, 51) missed >2 and 24% (95% CI: 19, 29) greater than or equal to5
days of school or day care; 17% (95% CI: 13, 21) spent greater than or equa
l to3 days in bed; 54% (95% CI: 47, 60) of caretakers missed at least 1 and
18% (95% CI: 13, 24) missed >2 days of school or work; and 32% (95% CI: 28
, 38) of patients were still using greater than baseline medication at 2 we
eks. Reported relapse rates were averaged at 13% (95% CI: 10, 17) with 3% (
95% CI: 1, 5) admitted. Routine office follow-up was poor: 29% (95% CI: 25,
34) had had a visit; 48% (95% CI: 43, 54) reported no visit/none planned.
Conclusions. A considerable proportion of inner-city pediatric patients dis
charged from the hospital from the ED after standard treatment for acute as
thma had poor short-term outcomes. Conventional markers of successful ED tr
eatment, such as avoiding hospital admission or relapse, do not adequately
describe outcomes of acute care. The patient-oriented measures described he
re may provide more useful indicators of outcome in the evaluation of acute
asthma care.