Short-term outcomes after acute treatment of pediatric asthma

Citation
Mw. Stevens et Mh. Gorelick, Short-term outcomes after acute treatment of pediatric asthma, PEDIATRICS, 107(6), 2001, pp. 1357-1362
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics,"Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
PEDIATRICS
ISSN journal
00314005 → ACNP
Volume
107
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1357 - 1362
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-4005(200106)107:6<1357:SOAATO>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Context. The short-term course of pediatric patients after emergency depart ment (ED) treatment for acute asthma has not been comprehensively documente d; most previous studies have limited outcomes to ED length-of-stay, hospit al admission, and relapse. Objective. To describe symptom persistence, medication use, functional disa bility, follow-up, and relapse in these children in the 2 weeks after acute treatment and ED discharge. Design. Randomly selected, prospective cohort from September 1996 to August 1997; follow-up telephone interviews at 1 and 2 weeks. Setting. A large, inner-city children's hospital emergency department. Patients. Random sample of pediatric asthma visits requiring ED treatment b ut not admission; 457 were eligible, 388 with complete follow-up (85%); fin al sample included 367 patients after multiple visits deleted. Main Outcome Measures. Details of symptom persistence, functional disabilit y, medication use, relapse, and routine follow-up. Results. Results included significant morbidity: 23% (95% confidence interv al [CI]: 19, 27) with cough and 12% (95% CI: 9, 15) with wheeze persistent at 2 weeks; 20% (95% CI: 16, 24) with decreased activity at 1 week; 45% (95 % CI: 39, 51) missed >2 and 24% (95% CI: 19, 29) greater than or equal to5 days of school or day care; 17% (95% CI: 13, 21) spent greater than or equa l to3 days in bed; 54% (95% CI: 47, 60) of caretakers missed at least 1 and 18% (95% CI: 13, 24) missed >2 days of school or work; and 32% (95% CI: 28 , 38) of patients were still using greater than baseline medication at 2 we eks. Reported relapse rates were averaged at 13% (95% CI: 10, 17) with 3% ( 95% CI: 1, 5) admitted. Routine office follow-up was poor: 29% (95% CI: 25, 34) had had a visit; 48% (95% CI: 43, 54) reported no visit/none planned. Conclusions. A considerable proportion of inner-city pediatric patients dis charged from the hospital from the ED after standard treatment for acute as thma had poor short-term outcomes. Conventional markers of successful ED tr eatment, such as avoiding hospital admission or relapse, do not adequately describe outcomes of acute care. The patient-oriented measures described he re may provide more useful indicators of outcome in the evaluation of acute asthma care.