An economic overview of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Citation
Hs. Ruchlin et Ej. Dasbach, An economic overview of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, PHARMACOECO, 19(6), 2001, pp. 623-642
Citations number
61
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology
Journal title
PHARMACOECONOMICS
ISSN journal
11707690 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
623 - 642
Database
ISI
SICI code
1170-7690(2001)19:6<623:AEOOCO>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Relatively few pharmacoeconomic studies have been conducted on this disease. This article reviews available information about the utili sation of healthcare resources and cost of care, and the cost or cost effec tiveness of therapeutic interventions reported for this disease. Burden-of-illness data indicate that hospital care, medications and oxygen therapy were the major cost drivers in these studies. Mean annual Medicare expenditures in the US were $US11 X41 (2000 values) for patients with CORD compared with $US4901 for all covered patients. Utilisation was skewed; the most expensive 10% of the Medicare beneficiaries accounted for nearly 50% of total expenditures for this disease. Costs are associated with health st atus, age, physician specialty, geographic location and type of insurance c overage. Six types of interventions were assessed in the literature - pharmacotherap y, oxygen therapy, home care, surgery, exercise and rehabilitation and heal th education. The studies used different analytic strategies (e.g. cost-min imisation and cost-effectiveness analyses) and even within the realm of cos t-effectiveness analyses, no uniformity existed as to how outcome was measu red. Patient severity was not always delineated, and the length of the foll ow-up period, while quite short, varied. Only 11 of the 34 evaluations were based on randomised controlled trials. Cost-minimisation studies generally found no significant difference in the cost of antimicrobial treatment for first-line, second-line and third-line agents. Studies of bronchodilators indicated that ipratropium bromide alone or in combination with salbutamol (albuterol) was the preferred medication . The major area for achieving cost savings is by reducing hospital utilisa tion. As the annual. rate of hospitalisation is relatively low, large patie nt samples will be required to demonstrate an economic advantage for a new therapy. The major challenges will be financing such a study, and selecting an outco me measure that satisfies both clinical and economic conventions.