K. Moller et al., Examination of a low density polyethylene (LDPE) film after 15 years of service as an air and water vapour barrier, POLYM DEGR, 73(1), 2001, pp. 69-74
A low density polyethylene (LDPE) film used as an air and water vapour barr
ier for 15 years in an exterior wooden wall construction has been examined
regarding ageing properties. The wall in question was part of a small house
used for building material testing purposes only. During its use, the majo
r part of the him was firmly pressed between plywood boards made of spruce
and plasterboards. By pure chance, however, parts of the him had been hangi
ng loose over the plasterboard into the room and thus exposed to room tempe
rature air as opposed to the rest of the film. Different parts of the same
LDPE film had thus been exposed to natural ageing in different environments
allowing for interesting comparisons to be made. Tensile testing, size exc
lusion chromatography (SEC), oxygen induction temperature measurements, W a
nd FTIR spectroscopy, and MALDI mass spectrometry have been used to examine
the differently aged parts of the LDPE film. It was found that the him con
tained the antioxidant beta-(3,5-ditert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionic oc
tadecyl ester (trade name Irganox 1076). Despite the fact that the part of
the film found inside the wall had lost about 75% of its initial antioxidan
t concentration as compared to the part exposed to the room's environment,
the latter had a substantially lower stabilising power as indicated by a co
nsiderably lower oxygen induction temperature. Most likely,the antioxidant
has been "deactivated" through its protective action in preventing oxidativ
e degradation of the polymer of the "room" film. The loss of antioxidant in
the "wall" film can most likely be attributed to migration and loss to the
surrounding wall construction materials. Despite substantial losses of act
ive antioxidant for both parts of the him, through different mechanisms, bo
th parts have retained their tensile properties as indicated by normal valu
es of elongation- and stress-at-break. Furthermore, the SEC chromatograms i
ndicate no degradation of the polymer in neither parts of the film. Accordi
ngly, the polymer itself seems not yet to have been affected by ageing. (C)
2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.