The process of coevolution between host and enemy has traditionally been vi
ewed as an evolutionary arms race between resistance and counterresistance.
The armsrace metaphor of coevolution is widely accepted because it explain
s the evolution of many characters in species involved in host-enemy intera
ctions. However, molecular work in plant-pathogen systems suggests a coevol
utionary interplay between plant recognition of an attacking pathogen and p
athogen evasion from recognition. We refer to this process as information c
oevolution, and contrast this with arms race coevolution to show that these
two processes result in very different patterns of host resistance and ene
my virulence at the population level. First, information coevolution result
s in a lower proportion of hosts that are susceptible to enemy attack withi
n a population. Second, information coevolution produces a pattern of local
maladaptation of enemy on host, a naturally occurring phenomenon that is d
ifficult to explain under arms race coevolution. We then conduct a literatu
re review to survey the empirical support for either mode of coevolution us
ing the predicted patterns of host resistance and enemy virulence. Evidence
supports both modes of coevolution in plant-enemy interactions, whereas no
support is found for information coevolution in vertebrate-parasite and in
vertebrate-parasite systems.