Relationship between airway sensitivity to adenosine 5 ' monophosphate andthe shape of the concentration-response curve to methacholine in subjects with allergic rhinitis
L. Prieto et al., Relationship between airway sensitivity to adenosine 5 ' monophosphate andthe shape of the concentration-response curve to methacholine in subjects with allergic rhinitis, RESP MED, 95(6), 2001, pp. 457-463
The objective of this study was to determine differences in airway sensitiv
ity to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) between allergic rhinitis subjects
with plateau and those without evidence of plateau on the concentration-res
ponse curves to methacholine.
A total of 51 adults (38 subjects with allergic rhinitis and 13 healthy con
trols) were challenged with increasing concentrations of methacholine and A
MP. The methacholine challenge was terminated when there was a 40% or more
decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), whereas the AMP chall
enge was stopped when FEV1 had fallen by more than 20%.
A plateau for methacholine was detected in all 13 healthy controls and in 2
7 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR-plateau group), whereas 11 subjects w
ith allergic rhinitis did not exhibit a plateau (AR-non-plateau group). The
median (range) PC20 AMP (provocative concentration required to produce a 2
0% fall in FEV1) value for the AR-non-plateau group was 44.0 mg ml(-1) (3.3
-400.0), compared with 400.0 mg ml(-1) (12.1-400.0) in the AR-plateau group
(P=0.03) and 400.0 mg ml(-1) in the healthy control group (P=0.007). The p
roportion of subjects who showed bronchoconstriction in response to AMP was
higher in the AR-non-plateau group (73%) than in the AR-plateau group (30%
) (P=0.03). However, three subjects with allergic rhinitis who had normal s
ensitivity to methacholine and plateau showed bronchoconstriction in respon
se to AMP.
We conclude that, in subjects with allergic rhinitis, the absence of platea
u on the concentration-response curves to methacholine is associated with a
higher prevalence and degree of bronchoconstriction in response to AMP. Ho
wever, the two bronchoconstrictor stimuli were not identifying the same abn
ormalities of the airways.