Relative effectiveness of kinetic analysis vs single point readings for classifying environmental samples based on community-level physiological profiles (CLPP)
Jl. Garland et al., Relative effectiveness of kinetic analysis vs single point readings for classifying environmental samples based on community-level physiological profiles (CLPP), SOIL BIOL B, 33(7-8), 2001, pp. 1059-1066
The relative effectiveness of average-well-color-development-normalized sin
gle-point absorbance readings (AWCD) vs the kinetic parameters mu (m), lamb
da, A, and integral (AREA) of the modified Gompertz equation tit to the col
or development curve resulting from reduction of a redox sensitive dye from
microbial respiration of 95 separate sole carbon sources in microplate wel
ls was compared for a dilution series of rhizosphere samples from hydroponi
cally grown wheat and potato ranging in inoculum densities of 1 x 10(4) - 4
x 10(6) cells ml(-1). Patterns generated with each parameter were analyzed
using principal component analysis (PCA) and discriminant function analysi
s (DFA) to test relative resolving power. Samples of equivalent cell densit
y (undiluted samples) were correctly classified by rhizosphere type for all
parameters based on DFA analysis of the first five PC scores. Analysis of
undiluted and 1:4 diluted samples resulted in misclassification of at least
two of the wheat samples for all parameters except the AWCD normalized (0.
50 abs. units) data, and analysis of undiluted, 1:4, and 1:16 diluted sampl
es resulted in misclassification for all parameter types. Ordination of sam
ples along the first principal component (PC) was correlated to inoculum de
nsity in analyses performed on all of the kinetic parameters, but no such i
nfluence was seen for AWCD-derived results. The carbon sources responsible
for classification differed among the variable types with the exception of
AREA and A, which were strongly correlated. These results indicate that the
use of kinetic parameters for pattern analysis in CLPP may provide some ad
ditional information, but only if the influence of inoculum density is care
fully considered. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.