As. Dajani et al., PREVENTION OF BACTERIAL-ENDOCARDITIS - RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE AMERICAN-HEART-ASSOCIATION, The Journal of the American Dental Association, 128(8), 1997, pp. 1142-1151
OBJECTIVE-To update recommendations issued by the American Heart Assoc
iation last published in 1990 for the prevention of bacterial endocard
itis in individuals at risk for this disease. PARTICIPANTS-An ad hoc w
riting group appointed by the American Heart association for their exp
ertise in endocarditis and treatment with liaison members representing
the American Dental Association, the Infectious Diseases Society of A
merica, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Society fo
r Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. EVIDENCE-The recommendations in this art
icle reflect analyses of relevant literature regarding procedure-relat
ed endocarditis, in vitro susceptibility data of pathogens causing end
ocarditis, results of prophylactic studies in animal models of endocar
ditis and retrospective analyses of human endocarditis cases in terms
of antibiotic prophylaxis usage patterns and apparent prophylaxis fail
ures, MEDLINE database searches from 1936 through 1996 were done using
root words endocarditis, bacteremia and antibiotic prophylaxis. Recom
mendations in this document fall into evidence level III of the U.S. P
reventive Services Task Force categories of evidence. Consensus Proces
s-The recommendations were formulated by the writing group after speci
fic therapeutic regimens were discussed. The consensus statement was s
ubsequently reviewed by outside experts not affiliated with the writin
g group and by the Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee of the
American Heart Association, These guidelines are meant to aid practiti
oners but are not intended as the standard of care or as a substitute
for clinical judgment. CONCLUSIONS-Major changes in the updated recomm
endations include the following: (1) emphasis that most cases of endoc
arditis are not attributable to an invasive procedure; (2) cardiac con
ditions are stratified into high-, moderate- and negligible-risk categ
ories based on potential outcome if endocarditis develops; (3) procedu
res that may cause bacteremia and for which prophylaxis is recommended
are more clearly specified; (4) an algorithm was developed to more cl
early define when prophylaxis is recommended for patients with mitral
valve prolapse; (5) for oral or dental procedures the initial amoxicil
lin dose is reduced to 2 g, a follow-up antibiotic dose is no longer r
ecommended, erythromycin is no longer recommended for penicillin-aller
gic individuals, but clindamycin and other alternatives are offered.