Gw. Rouse, A cladistic analysis of Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914 (Polychaeta, Annelida): formerly the phyla Pogonophora and Vestimentifera, ZOOL J LINN, 132(1), 2001, pp. 55-80
It has been proposed in recent years that the phyla Pogonophora and Vestime
ntifera are a derived clade of polychaete annelids. It has also been propos
ed that if this clade belongs among polychaetes, then the taxon name Pogono
phora is misleading and should revert to a name first formulated for the gr
oup, Siboglinidae Caullery, 1914. This recommendation is adopted in this pa
per, and a cladistic study using terminals of 'generic' rank in the former
Pogonophora (including Vestimentifera) is undertaken. The purpose of this i
s to assess which taxon names should now be used for clades within Siboglin
idae, and to provide a revised taxonomy, based on phylogenetic principles.
Another major aim is to assess the position of the vestimentiferan clade wi
thin Siboglinidae. The results show that Vestimentifera is the sister group
to Sclerolinum, and this clade is then sister group to Frenulata, i.e. the
remaining Siboglinidae. The results suggest that all taxa within Siboglini
dae that are not genera or species are redundant, except for the following:
Siboglinidae is defined as the first polychaete, and all its descendants,
to have an gut occluded by expanded endoderm filled with chemoautotrophic b
acteria, as seen in the holotype of Riftia pachyptila Jones, 1981. Monilife
ra can be defined based on apomorphy-based system such that it is the first
siboglinid, and all its descendants, to have rings of chaetae (uncini) in
the opisthosoma, as seen in the holotype of Sclerolinum magdalenae Southwar
d, 1972. Vestimentifera can be defined as the first siboglinid and all its
descendants to have a vestimentum as seen in the holotype of Riftia pachypt
ia. Frenulata is defined as the siboglinid, and all its descendants, to hav
e a mid-trunk girdle, as seen in the holotype of Siboglinum weberi Caullery
, 1914. The taxa of generic rank are not defined here since their monophyly
was not investigated.
(C) 2001 The Linnean Society of London.