Profile of drinking behaviour and comparison of self-report with the CAGE questionnaire and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in a rural Lesotho community
N. Siegfried et al., Profile of drinking behaviour and comparison of self-report with the CAGE questionnaire and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in a rural Lesotho community, ALC ALCOHOL, 36(3), 2001, pp. 243-248
This paper aims to: (1) profile the drinking behaviour of a rural Lesotho c
ommunity facing relocation; (2) compare the following measures of hazardous
drinking in this community: quantity/frequency self-report, the CAGE quest
ionnaire and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) levels; (3) describe
community awareness of, and attitude towards, treatment services. As part o
f a larger baseline survey of community health status, households in 29 vil
lages in Lesotho were randomly sampled. Consenting adults (n = 348) partici
pated in a face-to-face interview about alcohol use, which included the CAG
E. Blood was taken from participants for CDT determination. Fifty-three per
cent of men (37/69) and 19% of women (53/279) reported drinking alcohol. T
hirty-six per cent of men (25/69) and 9% of women (251279) were classified
as hazardous drinkers defined as drinking 350 g (males) or 225 g (females)
of alcohol/week, or 'engaged in bouts of heavy drinking 1 to 2 days a month
or more during the past 12 months'. Hazardous drinkers were significantly
more likely to be male and older, but did not differ from the rest of the s
ample on marital status. Using hazardous drinking as the standard, CAGE (sc
ore greater than or equal to2) had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 75%
for men and 62% for women. The parameters for CDT must be interpreted with
caution as the cut-offs for hazardous drinking, especially for women's dri
nking, were lower than the usual cut-offs in published CDT studies. However
, the high specificities for CDT in men (100%; 19/19) and in women (77%; 11
0/142) are consistent with other studies, but the low PPV of 14% (5/37) for
men and women combined suggests that CDT is not effective as a predictor o
f hazardous drinking in this population. There was high awareness of availa
ble treatment services among participants, and most believed treatment to b
e beneficial. Overall, the study provides a comprehensive baseline profile
of drinking behaviour in this community, but did not show the CAGE question
naire or CDT profile to be useful in in this community.