Correlation between prenatal and neonatal birth order in twin pregnancy

Citation
St. Chasen et al., Correlation between prenatal and neonatal birth order in twin pregnancy, AM J PERIN, 18(3), 2001, pp. 151-154
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
ISSN journal
07351631 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
151 - 154
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-1631(2001)18:3<151:CBPANB>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Little data is available correlating the in utero order of presentation and the birth order of twins. Our objective was to determine whether birth ord er in twin pregnancies corresponds to the order of presentation early in pr egnancy. All twin pregnancies in which amniocentesis was performed from 199 6 to 1998 were identified. Those with discordant genders that delivered at our hospital were included. Order of presentation was documented by ultraso und at the time of amniocentesis. Delivery data were obtained from review o f medical records. Statistical comparison was done using two-tailed Fisher' s exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test. Sixty patients met inclusion criteria. Birth order corresponded to the order at the time of a mniocentesis in 55 of 60 cases (91.7%). There was no difference in the rate of concordance of prenatal and neonatal birth order in twins delivered vag inally compared with those delivered abdominally (90.9 vs. 91.8%,p = 1.0). Cases with discordant prenatal and neonatal birth order had similar materna l ages, gestational ages at amniocentesis and delivery, and fetal presentat ion at delivery as cases with concordant birth orders. In dichorionic twin pregnancies, birth order is established early in gestation in > 90% of case s regardless of route of delivery.