Judging jury service: Results of the North Carolina administrative office of the courts juror survey

Citation
Bl. Cutler et Dm. Hughes, Judging jury service: Results of the North Carolina administrative office of the courts juror survey, BEH SCI LAW, 19(2), 2001, pp. 305-320
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW
ISSN journal
07353936 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
305 - 320
Database
ISI
SICI code
0735-3936(2001)19:2<305:JJSROT>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
This study examined venirepersons' and jurors' levels of satisfaction with jury service. Surveys were distributed to all persons who reported for stat e court jury service during two one-week periods in each North Carolina cou nty. Questions concerned satisfaction with various aspects of jury service, the effects of service, hardships experienced, details of and reactions to cases heard, and basic demographic information. Responses were obtained fr om 82 of the 100 counties and 4,654 venirepersons (of whom 1,478 served as jurors). Consistent with prior research on juror experiences, results gener ally revealed high levels of satisfaction and positive opinions about vario us aspects of jury service. Service did not influence opinions about the co urts for most respondents, and those whose opinions changed tended to becom e more positive about jury service. Suggestions for future research emphasi ze giving higher priority to publishing unpublished research on jury experi ence, explaining the high satisfaction levels observed in samples of jurors , and examining the impact of trial reform on juror satisfaction levels. Co pyright (C) 2001 John Whey & Sons, Ltd.