U. Guller et al., Neurogenic appendicopathy: A common yet almost unknown condition - Evaluation of 816 appendices and literature review, CHIRURG, 72(6), 2001, pp. 684-689
Background: Neurogenic appendicopathy (NA) represents an almost unknown pat
hology which clinically cannot be differentiated from acute appendicitis. T
he diagnosis can only be established histologically. Nerve proliferation an
d an increased number of endocrine cells are typical for NA. This study cha
racterizes the epidemiology, histology, clinical appearance and therapy of
NA. We evaluated the incidence of NA in macroscopically normal specimens fr
om patients presenting the symptoms of acute appendicitis and in incidental
appendectomies. Patients and methods: 816 routine appendix specimens were
examined at the Institute of Pathology, Universitity of Basel, for the pres
ence of NA. We analyzed the indication for appendectomy, the histological f
orm and the age and sex of the patients. Results: 140 appendices (17.1%) sh
owed the histological criteria for NA. 25% of incidental appendectomies wer
e positive for NA, as opposed to 53% of the macroscopically normal specimen
s of patients presenting the symptoms of acute appendicits (P < 0.0001). NA
is more frequent in men than in women (19.5% versus 14.5%, P = 0.057). Out
of the total of 140 NA, 105 (12.9%) were classified as central, 12 (1.5%)
as intramucosal and 5 (0.6%) as submucosal forms of NA. 18 times (2.2%) the
histologic subtype of NA was not specified. Conclusions: This study establ
ishes that NA is a frequent, often asymptomatic pathology. In more than hal
f of the macroscopically normal specimens of patients presenting symptoms o
f acute appendicitis NA can be diagnosed, significantly more than in incide
ntal appendectomies. Therefore it is imperative to remove and analyze a mac
roscopically normal appendix in a patient presenting symptoms of acute appe
ndicitis if no other intraabdominal pathology can be found.