Point-of-care testing (POCT) can be introduced by laboratory directors or c
linicians in response to the need for rapid results to guide treatment. The
professional responsibility for ensuring reliable and accurate results is
well-defined in some countries such as France, but the role and responsibil
ity of the laboratory is less clear in many other places. When point-of-car
e instrument technology and the intrinsic design of the device leads to dev
ice-specific parameters or analytical differences from laboratory-based equ
ipment, there is a risk of misinterpretation and erroneous treatment decisi
ons. Laboratory staffs are more often aware of the interaction of analytica
l technology and result interpretation than clinicians, making it more rati
onal to involve the laboratory in the selection of point-of-care equipment,
procedures, and therapeutic decisions based on the results. The design con
trol and risk-analysis provisions of emerging regulations such as the EU in
vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD) can be interpreted as engaging the m
anufacturer's responsibility, even when the equipment is functioning accord
ing to specification. This is especially hue of device-specific parameters
in which cross-calibration or traceability to a reference material or metho
d is not possible. This is a further argument for involvement of the labora
tory in the selection and implementation of point-of-care testing devices.
(C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.