Ja. Ivany, Evaluation of herbicides for control of tufted vetch (Vicia cracca) and narrow-leaved vetch (Vicia angustifolia), CROP PROT, 20(5), 2001, pp. 447-450
Production of soyabeans (Glycine mar, L. Merr) in rotation with spring barl
ey (Hordeum vulgare L) in Prince Edward Island, Canada, has increased in re
cent years and in fields used for several years tufted vetch (Vicia cracca
L.) and narrow-leaved vetch (Vicia angustifolia Reichard) have become more
of a problem. Experiments were conducted in the field and glasshouse to eva
luate herbicide treatments that would provide adequate vetch control. In fi
eld studies on soyabeans, combinations of metribuzin and metolachlor gave 9
4-100% control of tufted vetch, whereas, combinations of bentazon with imaz
ethapyr, or aciflurofen, or thifensulfuron did not provide control. Imazeth
apyr or thifensulfuron applied alone post-emergence did not control tufted
vetch. In glasshouse studies, metribuzin gave complete control of tufted ve
tch and narrow-leaf vetch when used at 500 and 1000 g/ha. Combinations of m
etribuzin and metolachlor at lower rates controlled tufted vetch and narrow
-leaf vetch. In glasshouse studies using herbicides normally used in barley
, tufted vetch and narrow-leaf vetch were controlled by the herbicides thif
ensulfuron methyl/tribenuron methyl when used in combination with MCPA amin
e. When thifensulfuron methyl/tribenuron methyl was used in combination wit
h 2,4-D amine control of narrow-leaf vetch was less than that achieved with
tufted vetch. Tufted vetch and narrow-leaf vetch were not controlled by th
ifensulfuron methyl/tribenuron methyl, MCPA amine, 2,4-D amine, or by bromo
xynil. Dicamba/2,4-D gave 92% control of narrowleaf vetch but was not effec
tive on tufted vetch. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.