Identification of underachievers in Hong Kong: do different methods selectdifferent underachievers?

Authors
Citation
Kl. Lau et Dw. Chan, Identification of underachievers in Hong Kong: do different methods selectdifferent underachievers?, EDUC STUD, 27(2), 2001, pp. 187-200
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Education
Journal title
EDUCATIONAL STUDIES
ISSN journal
03055698 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
187 - 200
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-5698(200106)27:2<187:IOUIHK>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Although academic underachievement is a familiar topic in educational resea rch, there is no consensus on how underachievers should be selected. This s tudy aimed to compare different selection methods, absolute split method, s imple difference score method, regression method and nomination, in the ide ntification of underachievers from a sample of 126 Chinese Grade 7 students . The results indicated that the three different statistical methods showed high congruence in selecting underachievers, but nomination selected a dif ferent group of underachievers. It was suggested that, depending on researc h or intervention purposes, information from statistical methods and nomina tion might combine to provide a more comprehensive identification procedure .