The phenomenon of aging structures has focused attention on the problems of
multiple-site damage (MSD) and widespread fatigue damage (WFD). In Austral
ia, the problem was highlighted by the November 1990 failure of a Royal Aus
tralian Air Force (RAAF) Macchi aircraft which suffered a port wing failure
whilst in an estimated 6 g maneuvre and by the September 1998 explosion at
the EXXON gas plant in Victoria. To assist in the understanding and the ma
nagement of this problem the present paper uses the newly developed finite
element alternating technique, for an arbitrary number of interacting three
dimensional cracks, which we refer to as the MSD FEAT algorithm, to evalua
te whether compliance measurements are useful in assessing continuing airwo
rthiness. Traditionally the MSD FEAT and the FEAT analysis tools, i.e. the
analysis methodology for a single crack, have been used only to analyse the
stress intensity factor distributions around crack faces. The new work des
cribed in this paper enables the displacement field, and hence the complian
ce, to be calculated at any given location within the structure. Initial re
sults confirm that this technique produces correct displacements and is cap
able of determining the crack tip opening displacement to within similar to
0.7% for semi-elliptical surface flaws. Earlier work conducted on two dimen
sional MSD problems found that when using compliance measurements to evalua
te cracking there was an optimal sensor length for monitoring crack interac
tion effects. The present paper extends this study to three-dimensional fla
ws via a combined analytical and experimental research program. The experim
ental work focuses on specimens containing two interacting quarter elliptic
al cracks. Here the changes in compliance of the specimen under monotonic l
oading, and fracture load, were measured and were found to be in good agree
ment with those predicted using the newly developed MSD FEAT algorithm. Res
ults of this analysis indicate that placement of sensors in an optimal posi
tion is crucial. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.