Ch. Greenberg, Response of reptile and amphibian communities to canopy gaps created by wind disturbance in the southern Appalachians, FOREST ECOL, 148(1-3), 2001, pp. 135-144
Reptile and amphibian communities were sampled in intact gaps created by wi
nd disturbance, salvage-logged gaps, and closed canopy mature forest (contr
ols). Sampling was conducted during June-October in 1997 and 1998 using dri
ft fences with pitfall and funnel traps. Basal area of live trees, shade, l
eaf litter coverage, and litter depth was highest in controls and lowest in
salvaged gaps. Percent cover, length, and diameter of coarse woody debris
(CWD) were significantly greater in intact gaps than in salvaged gaps or co
ntrols. Coarse woody debris was more decayed and had less bark in controls
than gaps. The relative abundance of salamanders and American toads, and sp
ecies richness and diversity of amphibians did not differ among treatments.
In contrast, relative abundance of two lizard species and (marginally) sna
kes, and species richness and diversity of reptiles was higher in both gap
treatments than in controls. Results suggest that higher light in gaps posi
tively influenced reptile abundance, but CWD at the tested levels was not a
n important determinant of habitat quality. The presence of a partial canop
y and other forest features in both gap treatments may have adequately reta
ined the microclimatic conditions required by moisture-sensitive amphibians
. Xeric study sites and an associated assemblage of species that are pre-ad
apted to relatively warm, dry conditions also might partially explain the a
bsence of any significant response by amphibians. In the closed canopy fore
sts of the southern Appalachians, I suggest that salamanders were historica
lly dominant, whereas many reptile species occurred at low densities and de
pended upon infrequent natural disturbance to create ephemeral patches of s
uitable habitat. Further study is required to determine what parameters of
disturbance influence reptile and amphibian communities, and how these effe
cts might differ along a moisture gradient and among species. (C) 2001 Else
vier Science B.V. All rights reserved.