BACKGROUND: Does dietary fat play a central role in weight gain and develop
ment of obesity? Do low-fat diets have adverse effects on blood lipids?
OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: To answer these questions we have reviewed the eviden
ce linking the dietary fat content to energy balance and obesity, and exami
ned the efficacy and safety of ad libitum low fat, high carbohydrate/protei
n diets in the prevention and management of obesity.
RESULTS: Physiological studies have provided insight into the mechanisms by
which the macronutrients differ in their effect on energy balance: (1) ene
rgy from fat is less satiating than energy from carbohydrate, and a high fa
t/carbohydrate ratio in the diet promotes passive overconsumption, a positi
ve energy balance and weight gain in susceptible individuals; (2) fat is mo
re readily absorbed from the intestine and fecal energy toss is much lower
with a high dietary fat/carbohydrate ratio; (3) carbohydrate is more thermo
genic than fat and energy expenditure is lower during positive energy balan
ce produced by a diet with a high fat/carbohydrate ratio than during positi
ve energy balance produced by a diet with a low fat/carbohydrate ratio. Ran
domized intervention studies comparing low fat diets to normal fat diets sh
ow that low fat diets prevent weight gain in normal weight subjects and pro
duce weight loss in overweight individuals. In our meta-analysis of ad libi
tum low fat interventions we included 16 trials involving 1728 individuals.
The difference in weight loss between intervention and control groups was
2.5 kg (95% CI, 1.5 - 3.5; P < 0.0001). Weight loss was positively related
to pre-treatment body weight (r = 0.52, P < 0.05) and to reduction in perce
ntage energy as fat (0.37 kg/%, P < 0.005). Extrapolated to a body mass ind
ex (BMI) similar to 30 kg/mz, and assuming a 10% reduction in dietary fat,
the predicted weight loss would be 4.4 kg (95% CI, 2.06.8 kg), which has be
en confirmed in subsequent studies. Newer studies have shown that replacing
some carbohydrate with protein may enhance weight loss.
CONCLUSION: The American Paradox, the observation that obesity prevalence i
s increasing despite a slight decrease in population dietary fat consumptio
n, is easily explained by the concomitantly decreasing physical activity, w
hich reduces fat requirements and counteracts the beneficial effect of a sl
ight reduction in dietary fat. Low fat diets with a high content of complex
carbohydrates and protein do not produce any adverse effect on cardiovascu
lar risk factors when weight loss is allowed to occur, and they have been s
hown to decrease mortality among high risk subjects.