Wh. Motes et Ag. Woodside, Purchase experiments of extra-ordinary and regular influence strategies using artificial and real brands, J BUS RES, 53(1), 2001, pp. 15-35
We apply basic tenets from operant conditioning and cognitive decision theo
ry to test the impacts of immediate and long-term impacts of extra-ordinary
and regular influence strategies on consumer brand choice. Seven hypothese
s are tested in an in-home experiment with 114 subjects assigned randomly t
o five groups. Hypothesis 1: Most consumers in a new environment (e.g., wit
h three to four brands per product category) initially try all available br
ands. Hypothesis 2: Across purchase periods, unassisted by extra-ordinary i
nfluence strategies, a brand's penetration rate (i.e., share of customers b
uying the brand) declines in the long run. Hypothesis 3: Across purchase pe
riods unassisted by extra-ordinary influence strategies, the average buying
frequency per buyer (BFB) for a brand remains stable. Hypothesis 4: Substa
ntial increases (decreases) in a brand's penetration occurs during periods
when extra-ordinary (i.e., assisted trial) influence strategies are impleme
nted, e.g., price decreases (increases) influence substantial penetration i
ncreases (decreases). Hypothesis 5: Most of the impacts on penetration resu
lting from extra-ordinary influence strategies disappear in subsequent unas
sisted purchase periods. Hypothesis 6: However, the relatively small long-t
erm impacts of extra-ordinary influence strategies may be substantive, e.g.
, the negative long-term effect reported by Doob et al. (Doob AN, Carlsmith
JM, Freedman JL, Landauer TK, Tom Jr. S. Effect of initial selling price o
n subsequent sales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1969;11:345-50.). Hypothesis 7: Incr
eases and decreases in brand purchases are associated with positive and neg
ative attitude shifts toward the brand, respectively. Hypothesis 8: The NBD
/LSD models are accurate in forecasting penetration and buying frequency in
unassisted (i.e., ordinary influence) purchase periods. The findings suppo
rt all hypotheses except Hypotheses 3 and 7. Implications for developing a
theory of influence strategies on short-term and long-term behavior are dis
cussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.