Paclitaxel and gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract: A phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl CancerResearch Network
Aa. Meluch et al., Paclitaxel and gemcitabine chemotherapy for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract: A phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl CancerResearch Network, J CL ONCOL, 19(12), 2001, pp. 3018-3024
Purpose: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of combination chemotherapy
with paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced transitional-cell
carcinoma of the urothelial tract.
Patients and Methods: Fifty-four patients with advanced unresectable urothe
lial carcinoma entered this multi-centered, community-based, phase II trial
between May 1997 and December 1999. All patients were treated with paclita
xel 200 mg/m(2) by 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 and gemcitabin
e 1,000 mg/m(2) IV an days 1, 8, and 15; courses were repeated every 21 day
s. Patients who had objective response or stable disease continued treatmen
t for six courses.
Results: Twenty-nine of 54 patients (54%; 95% confidence interval, 40% to 6
7%) had major responses to treatment, including 7% complete responses. With
a median follow-up of 24 months, 16 patients (30%) remain alive and nine (
17%) are progression-free, The median survival for the entire group was 14.
4 months; 1- and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 57% and 25%, respecti
vely. Seven (47%) of 15 patients previously treated with platinum-based che
motherapy responded to paclitaxel/gemcitabine. Grade 3/4 toxicity was prima
rily hematologic, including leukopenia (46%), thrombocytopenia (13%), and a
nemia (28%). Ten patients (19%) required hospitalization for neutropenia an
d fever, and one patient had treatment-related septic death.
Conclusion: The combination of paclitaxel and gemcitabine is active and wel
l tolerated in the first- or second-line treatment of patients with advance
d transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract. Response rate and du
ration compare favorably with those produced by other active, first-line re
gimens. This regimen should be further evaluated in phase II and III studie
s, as well as in patients with compromised renal function. J Clin Oncol 19:
3018-3014, (C) 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.