The authors evaluated 3 methods developed to assess the level of monitor ca
thode ray tube (CRT) sharpness. Results include a comparison of 2 observer-
based methods to a charged coupled device (CCD) digital camera-based method
for the purposes of CRT equipment comparison, acceptance testing, and rout
ine CRT quality control. Three methods designed to measure a monitor's shar
pness were evaluated on a single 20-inch CRT monitor. We defined signal-to-
noise ratio (SNR) to be the overall signal difference measured by each meth
od from the highest to lowest values divided by the average standard deviat
ion of the measurements. Comparing the results of the 3 methods, the author
s found that the digital CCD camera-based method provided a much higher SNR
than the 2 observer-based methods and, therefore, is the preferred of the
3 methods for measuring the sharpness of CRT displays. The SNR values for t
he CCD, Cx and line target methods were 151.5, 4.9, and 4.3, respectively.
The Cx target observer-based method (a novel target and scoring routine dub
bed the "Cx" target because of its appearance) had a higher SNR than the li
ne target observer-based method. The average time and standard deviation re
quired to score the Cx and the line targets were 5.45 +/- 2.15 minutes and
8.34 +/- 2.95 minutes, respectively. The observer-based method results land
variability) versus the camera-based method results land variability) indi
cate strong linear relationships. Exploring this finding and the optimizati
on of the camera-based method are the subjects of future research. Copyrigh
t (C) 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.