Satellite estimation of spectral surface UV irradiance 2. Effects of homogeneous clouds and snow

Citation
Na. Krotkov et al., Satellite estimation of spectral surface UV irradiance 2. Effects of homogeneous clouds and snow, J GEO RES-A, 106(D11), 2001, pp. 11743-11759
Citations number
74
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Volume
106
Issue
D11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
11743 - 11759
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
This paper extends the theoretical analysis of the estimation of the surfac e UV irradiance from satellite ozone and reflectivity data from a clear-sky case to a cloudy atmosphere and snow-covered surface. Two methods are comp ared for the estimation of cloud-transmission factor C-T, the ratio of clou dy to clear-sky surface irradiance: (1) the Lambert equivalent reflectivity (LER) method and (2) a method based on radiative transfer calculations for a homogeneous (plane parallel) cloud embedded into a molecular atmosphere with ozone absorption. The satellite-derived C-T from the NASA Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) is compared with ground-based C-T estimations f rom the Canadian network of Brewer spectrometers for the period 1989-1998. For snow-free conditions the TOMS derived C, at 324 nm approximately agrees with Brewer data with a correlation coefficient of similar to0.9 and a sta ndard deviation of similar to0.1. The key source of uncertainty is the diff erent size of the TOMS FOV (similar to 100 km field of view) and the much s maller ground instrument FOV, As expected, the standard deviations of weekl y and monthly C-T averages were smaller than for daily values. The plane-pa rallel cloud method produces a systematic C-T bias relative to the Brewer d ata (+7% at low solar zenith angles to -10% at large solar zenith angles). The TOMS algorithm can properly account for conservatively scattering cloud s and snow/ice if the regional snow albedo R-S is known from outside data. Since R-S varies on a daily basis, using a climatology will result in addit ional error in the satellite-estimated C-T. The C-T error has the same sign as the R-S error and increases over highly reflecting surfaces. Finally, c louds polluted with absorbing aerosols transmit less radiation to the groun d than conservative clouds for the same satellite reflectance and flatten s pectral dependence of C-T. Both effects reduce C-T compared to that estimat ed assuming conservative cloud scattering. The error increases if polluted clouds are over snow.