The community involved in modeling radiation transfer over terrestrial surf
aces designed and implemented the first phase of a radiation transfer model
intercomparison (RAMI) exercise. This paper discusses the rationale and mo
tivation for this endeavor, presents the intercomparison protocol as well a
s the evaluation procedures, and describes the principal results. Participa
nts were asked to simulate the transfer of radiation for a variety of preci
sely defined terrestrial environments and illumination conditions. These we
re abstractions of typical terrestrial systems and included both homogeneou
s and heterogeneous scenes. The differences between the results generated b
y eight different models, including both one-dimensional and three-dimensio
nal approaches, were then documented and analyzed. RAMI proposed a protocol
to quantitatively assess the consequences of the model discrepancies with
respect to application, such as those motivating the development of physica
lly based inversion procedures. This first phase of model intercomparison h
as already proved useful in assessing the ability of the modeling community
to generate similar radiation fields despite the large panoply of models t
hat were tested. A detailed analysis of the results also permitted to ident
ify apparent "outliers" and their main deficiencies. Future undertakings in
this intercomparison framework must be oriented toward an expansion of RAM
I into other and more complex geophysical systems as well as the focusing o
n actual inverse problems.