Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing

Citation
Da. Nelson et Gs. Donaldson, Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing, J ACOUST SO, 109(6), 2001, pp. 2921-2933
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,"Optics & Acoustics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
ISSN journal
00014966 → ACNP
Volume
109
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2921 - 2933
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-4966(200106)109:6<2921:PRFSFM>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Psychophysical single-pulse forward-masking (SPFM) recovery functions were measured for three electrodes in each of eight subjects with the nucleus mi ni-22 cochlear implant. Masker and probe stimuli were single 200-mus/phase biphasic current pulses. Recovery functions were measured at several masker levels spanning the electric dynamic range of electrodes chosen from the a pical, middle, and basal regions of each subject's electrode array. Recover y functions were described by an exponential process in which threshold shi ft (in muA) decreased exponentially with increasing time delay between the masker and probe pulses. Two recovery processes were observed: An initial, rapid-recovery process with an average time constant of 5.5 ms was complete by about 10 ms. A second, slow-recovery process-involved less masking than the rapid-recovery process but encompassed much longer time delays, someti mes as long as several hundred milliseconds. Growth-of-masking slopes for t he rapid process depended upon time delay, as expected in an exponential re covery process. Unity slopes were observed at a time delay of 0 ms, whereas progressively shallower slopes were observed at time delays of 2 ms and 5 ms. Many recovery functions demonstrated nonmonotonicities or ''facilitatio n'' at very short masker-probe delays (1-2 ms). Such nonmonotonicities were usually most pronounced at low masker levels. Time constants for the rapid -recovery process did not vary systematically with masker level or with ele ctrode location along the implanted array. Most subjects' demonstrated rapi d-recovery time constants less than 7 ms; however, the subject with the lon gest duration of deafness prior to implantation exhibited clearly prolonged time constants (9-24 ms). Time constants obtained on basal electrodes were inversely related to word recognition scores. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society of America.