Recently the claim that post-Keynesianism represents a coherent altern
ative to orthodox/neoclassical theory has regained favour with many le
ading post-Keynesians. The purpose of this paper is to consider the ba
sis for any such claim that post-Keynesianism is a coherent alternativ
e. A variety of forms of coherence are considered in relation to post-
Keynesian analyses and a number of shortcomings are identified. The br
oad conclusion is that post-Keynesianism has not yet decided upon ifs
preferred conception of coherence and consequently, cannot be regarded
, at present, as an alternative school of economic thought.