How do large multi-unit firms in a deconstructing world reconcile the confl
icting forces of profits for today and flexibility to adapt for tomorrow? P
rofits for today requires order, control, and stability: adaptation for tom
orrow requires flexibility and creativity in the value-added system. Large
firms in many industries are confronted with this challenge of exploration
and exploitation. in the European financial services industries these confl
icting tendencies are increasingly obvious. Existing large financial player
s seem well placed to exploit the present but ill suited to adapt to the fu
ture. Why is this so, and what can be done about it! We consider the mechan
isms of selection, adaptation and co-evolution that take place between leve
ls within the firm and between the firm and its environment, and from this
identify four ideal kinds of strategic renewal journeys that organisations
can adopt as a way of coping with increasing environmental pressures. We la
bel these journeys: emergent, directed, facilitated, and transformational.
We show how these ideal types represent different options for top, middle a
nd front-line managers, and we identify how each type differs in its capaci
ty to cope with the changing environment. We illustrate our renewal journey
s with examples from Dutch (ING and Rabobank) and British financials (Barcl
ays, Lloyds and Prudential) and other organisations such as GE, IBM, Inter,
Novotel and Philips. We suggest that for mobilising renewal in well-establ
ished financial institutions-once protected but now exposed to the winds of
change-managers have to recognise that many of the current journeys are un
suitable for the future. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
.