Sea otters in Alaska are recognized as a single subspecies (Enhydra lutris
kenyoni) and currently managed as a single, interbreeding population. Howev
er, geographic and behavioral mechanisms undoubtably constrain sea otter mo
vements on much smaller scales. This pager applies the phylogeographic meth
od (Dizon et al. 1992) and considers distribution, population response, phe
notype and genotype data to identify stocks of sea otters within Alaska. Th
e evidence for separate stock identity is genotypic tall stocks), phenotypi
c (Southcentral and Southwest stocks), and geographic distribution (Southea
st stock), whereas population response data are equivocal tall stocks). Dif
ferences in genotype frequencies and the presence of unique genotypes among
areas indicate restricted gene flow. Genetic exchange may be limited by li
ttle or no movement across proposed stock boundaries and discontinuities in
distribution at proposed stock boundaries. Skull size differences (phenoty
pic) between Southwest and Southcentral Alaska populations further support
stock separation. Population response information was equivocal in either s
upporting or refuting stock identity. On the basis of this review, we sugge
st the following: (1) a Southeast stock extending from Dixon Entrance to Ca
pe Yakataga; (2) a Southcentral stock extending from Cage Yakataga to Cape
Douglas including Prince William Sound and Kenai peninsula cease; and (3) a
Southwest stock including Alaska Peninsula coast, the Aleutians to Attu Is
land, Barren, Kodiak, Pribilof Islands, and Bristol Bay.