Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: A clinicopathologic study of 38 cases with emphasis on morphologic variants and recent skeletal muscle-specific markers
Ma. Furlong et al., Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma in adults: A clinicopathologic study of 38 cases with emphasis on morphologic variants and recent skeletal muscle-specific markers, MOD PATHOL, 14(6), 2001, pp. 595-603
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (PRMS) is a rare and controversial tumor of sk
eletal muscle phenotype. Diagnostic criteria for PRMS by combined histology
and currently available immunohistochemistry have not been clearly defined
. We report 38 pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcomas in adults, explore morphologic
variants, and discuss our experience with both specific and nonspecific sk
eletal muscle markers in these tumors. Clinical data, morphology, and immun
ohistochemistry were reviewed. Electron microscopy was performed. Of 38 cas
es, there were 28 males and 10 females. Patient ages ranged from 21 to 81 y
ears (median = 54 y; mean = 51 y). Tumors were located in the lower extremi
ty (n = 18), abdomen/retroperitoneum (n = 6), chest/abdominal wall (n = 5),
spermatic cord/testes (n = 4), upper extremity (n = 3), and one each in th
e mouth and orbit. Tumor sizes ranged from 1.5 to 15.0 cm (mean = 7.3 cm; m
edian = 6.8 cm). The cases were divided into three variants, each with larg
e, atypical, pleomorphic polygonal rhabdomyoblasts (PRMB) with abundant eos
inophilic cytoplasm in varying numbers and different morphologic background
s of round or spindled rhabdomyoblasts (RMB).1. Classic PRMS: Predominantly
atypical PRMB in sheets (n = 8).2. Round cell PRMS: Clusters of PRMB throu
ghout the tumor with a background of slightly atypical, medium-sized, round
, blue RMB (n = 13).3. Spindle cell PRMS: Scattered PRMB in a predominance
of atypical spindled RMB arranged in a storiform growth pattern (n = 17). I
mmunohistochemistry revealed the following: myoglobin (37/38), MyoD1 (19/36
), skeletal muscle myogenin (myf4; 19/34), fast skeletal muscle myosin (4/5
), desmin (36/38), muscle-specific actin (MSA; 25/35), smooth muscle actin
(SMA; 15/33), and muscle specific myogenin (myf3; 25/35). Immunohistochemis
try was supportive of skeletal muscle differentiation with at least one pos
itive skeletal muscle-specific marker (myoglobin, MyoD1, fast skeletal musc
le myosin, or myf4). In addition, all cases had some positivity for nonspec
ific muscle markers (desmin, MSA, SMA, myf3). Electron microscopy (EM), per
formed on eight selected cases from all three morphologic groups, demonstra
ted definitive skeletal muscle differentiation in all cases. Follow-up, ava
ilable on 30 (79%) cases, revealed that 70% of patients died of disease (me
an 20 months, range 1 month-108 months), 3% were alive with disease at 12 m
onths (n = 1); and 27% had no evidence of disease (mean, 83 mo; range, 18 t
o 108 mo). PRMS, a tumor of predominantly middle-aged adult males in the lo
wer extremity, can be diagnosed by the morphologic presence of scattered PR
MB with immunohistochemical evidence of at least one skeletal muscle-specif
ic marker. There are three morphologic variants of PRMS. The appropriate di
agnosis of PRMS is significant as it is a high-grade sarcoma, with an aggre
ssive clinical course.