Comparative evaluation of fecal fat excretion induced by orlistat and chitosan

Citation
R. Guerciolini et al., Comparative evaluation of fecal fat excretion induced by orlistat and chitosan, OBES RES, 9(6), 2001, pp. 364-367
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
OBESITY RESEARCH
ISSN journal
10717323 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
364 - 367
Database
ISI
SICI code
1071-7323(200106)9:6<364:CEOFFE>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects of chitosan and orlistat on fecal fat exc retion. Research Methods and Procedure: A randomized, open-label, two-period sequen tial design study was used. A total of 12 healthy adult volunteers within 2 0% of their ideal body weight entered a 7-day run-in diet period before bei ng randomized to orlistat (120 mg) or chitosan (890 mg) three times daily f or 7 days. Subjects then crossed over treatment regimens for an additional 7-day period. Subjects followed a standardized diet (2500 kcal/d, 30% as fa t) for the entire 21-day study. Feces were collected on days 4 to 7 of the run-in period (baseline) and during the two treatment periods. Mean daily f ecal fat excretion was measured at baseline and during each treatment regim en. Results: Mean baseline fecal fat excretion for all subjects was 1.36 +/- 0. 45 g/d. During orlistat treatment, mean fecal fat excretion significantly i ncreased from baseline (+16.13 +/- 7.27 g/d; p < 0.001). No significant eff ect was observed with chitosan (+0.27 +/- 1.02 g/d; p = 0.379). Fecal fat e xcretion was significantly greater with orlistat than-with chitosan (p < 0. 001; 95% confidence intervals: 11.73; 20.00 g/d). Discussion: This study provides additional evidence of the inhibitory effec t of orlistat on dietary fat absorption. Chitosan, however, has no effect o n fecal fat excretion.