The discovery that T-cell recognition of antigen can have distinct outcomes
has advanced understanding of peripheral T-cell tolerance, and opened up n
ew possibilities in immunotherapy. Anergy is one such outcome, and results
from partial T-cell activation. This can arise either due to subtle alterat
ion of the antigen, leading to a lower-affinity cognate interaction, or due
to a lack of adequate co-stimulation. The signalling defects in anergic T
cells are partially defined, and suggest that T-cell receptor (TCR) proxima
l, as well as downstream defects negatively regulate the anergic T cell's a
bility to be activated. Most importantly, the use of TCR-transgenic mice wa
s provided compelling evidence that anergy is an in vivo phenomenon, and no
t merely an in vitro artefact. The:je findings raise the question as to whe
ther anergic T cells have any biological function. Studies in rodents and i
n man suggest that anergic T cells acquire regulatory properties; the regul
atory effects of anergic T cells require cell to cell contact, and appear t
o be mediated by inhibition of antigen-presenting cell immunogenicity. Clos
e similarities exist between anergic T cells, and the recently defined CD4(
+)CD25(+) population of spontaneously arising regulatory cells that serve t
o inhibit autoimmunity in mice. Taken together, these findings suggest that
a spec- tl um of regulatory T cells exists. At one end of the spectrum are
cells, such as anergic and CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells, which regulate via cell-
to-cell contact. At the other end of the spectrum are cells which secrete a
ntiinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 10 and transforming growth fa
ctor-beta. Tile challenge is to devise strategies that reliably induce T-ce
ll anergy in vivo, as a means of inhibiting immunity to allo- and autoantig
ens.