Background and Purpose. Based on changes in skin temperature alone, some au
thors have proposed that postganglionic sympathetic vasoconstrictor fibers
can be stimulated transcutaneously. Our goal was to determine the effects o
f low-frequency (2 bursts per second), burst-mode transcutaneous electrical
nerve stimulation (TENS) on calf vascular resistance, a more direct marker
of sympathetic vasoconstrictor outflow than skin temperature, in subjects
with no known pathology. Subjects. Fourteen women and 6 men (mean age = 31
years, SD = 13, range = 18-58) participated in this study. Methods. Calf bl
ood flow, arterial pressure, and skin temperature were measured while TENS
was applied over the common peroneal and tibial nerves. Results. Blood flow
immediately following stimulation was not affected by TENS applied just un
der or just above the threshold for muscle contraction. Transcutaneous elec
trical nerve stimulation applied at 25% above the motor threshold caused a
transient increase in calf blood flow. Regardless of stimulation intensity,
TENS had no effect on arterial pressure; therefore, calf vascular resistan
ce decreased only during the trial that was 25% above the motor threshold.
Regardless of stimulation intensity, TENS failed to alter dorsal or plantar
skin temperature. Discussion and Conclusion. These results demonstrate tha
t the effects of TENS on circulation depend on stimulation intensity. When
the intensity was sufficient to cause a moderate muscle contraction, a tran
sient, local increase in blood flow occurred. Cooling of the dorsal and pla
ntar skin occurred in both the stimulated and control legs, most likely bec
ause skin temperature acclimatized to ambient room temperature, rather than
because of any effect of TENS on circulation. The data, therefore, call in
to question the idea that postganglionic sympathetic efferent fibers are st
imulated when TENS is applied at clinically relevant intensities to people
without symptoms of cardiovascular or neuromuscular pathology.