The costs of exploiting an organism's immune function are expected to form
the basis of man) life-history trade-offs.. However, there has been debate
al,out whether such costs can he paid in energetic and nutritional terms. W
e addressed this question in a study of wintering, free-living, male great
tits by injecting them with a novel, non-pathogenic antigen (sheep red bloo
d cells) and measuring the changes in their basal metabolic rates and vario
us condition indices subsequent to immune challenge. The experiment showed
that activation of the immune system altered the metabolic activity and pro
file of immune cells in birds during the week subsequent to antigen injecti
on: individuals mounting an immune response had nearly 9% higher basal meta
bolic rates, 8% lower plasma albumin levels and 37% higher heterophile-to-l
ymphocyte ratios (leucocytic stress indices) than sham-injected control bir
ds. The) also lost nearly 3% (0.5 g) of their body mass subsequent to the i
mmune challenge. Individuals that mounted stronger antibody responses lost
more mass during the immune challenge. These results suggest that energetic
expenditures to immune response may have a non-trivial impact upon an indi
vidual's condition.