At both ends of the century, a border between the aberrant-marginal them an
d the ideal-central us has been constructed around and through the homosexu
al. I challenge the insufficiency of this characterization, so that we may
learn more, not only about homosexuality, but also about the ways in which
all human development is infused with an interplay between centrality and m
arginality, I argue that traditional developmental models are dominated by
the normative logic of centrality, with limited accounting for the developm
ental necessity of marginality, whereas postmodern theories of subjectivity
overvalue the potential of the margin and fail to account for the signific
ance of similarity and coherence in human relations. I then use that critic
ism as a platform for proposing five quasi-axioms toward a new developmenta
l model. Central to this new model, which employs constructs derived from c
haos and systems theories, is the interplay of centrality and marginality i
n any given life.