Study Design. An in vitro biomechanical study using a simulated cervical co
rpectomy model to compare the load-sharing properties and stiffnesses of tw
o static and two dynamic cervical plates.
Objectives. To evaluate the load-sharing properties of the instrumentation
with a full-length graft and with 10% graft subsidence and to measure the s
tiffness of the instrumentation systems about the axes of flexion-extension
, lateral bending, and axial torsion under these same conditions.
Summary of Background Data, No published reports comparing conventional and
dynamic cervical plates exist.
Methods. Six specimens of each of the four plate types were mounted on ultr
a-high molecular weight polyethylene-simulated vertebral bodies. A custom f
our-axis spine simulator applied pure flexion-extension, lateral bending, a
nd axial torsion moments under a constant 50 N axial compressive load. Load
sharing was calculated through a range of applied axial loads up to 120 N.
The stiffness of each construct was calculated in response to +/-2.5 Nm mo
ments about each axis of rotation with a full-length graft, a 10% shortened
graft, and no graft. ANOVA and Fisher's post hoc test were used to determi
ne statistical significance (alpha less than or equal to 0.05).
Results. The two locked cervical plates (CSLP and Orion) and the ABC dynami
c plate were similar in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and torsional s
tiffness. The DOC dynamic plate was consistently less stiff. The Orion plat
e load shared significantly less than the other three plates with a full gr
aft. Both the ABC and The DOC plates were able to load share with a shorten
ed graft, whereas the conventional plates were not.
Conclusions. All plates tested effectively load share with a full-length gr
aft, whereas the two dynamic cervical plates tested load share more effecti
vely than the locked plates with simulated graft subsidence. The effect of
dynamization on stiffness is dependent on plate design.