Optimal continuous sequential boundaries for monitoring toxicity in clinical trials: a restricted search algorithm

Citation
Ai. Goldman et Pj. Hannan, Optimal continuous sequential boundaries for monitoring toxicity in clinical trials: a restricted search algorithm, STAT MED, 20(11), 2001, pp. 1575-1589
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
ISSN journal
02776715 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1575 - 1589
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-6715(20010615)20:11<1575:OCSBFM>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Continuous monitoring of severe adverse experiences can ensure the timely t ermination of a clinical trial if the therapy is shown to be harmful. In th is paper we present methods for choosing a stopping rule for continuous mon itoring of toxicity in small trials. They are especially useful for small p hase II trials of about 30 patients for monitoring a binary toxicity event that is observed relatively quickly compared to the efficacy outcome. In 19 87 Goldman described an algorithm for computing the exact type I error rate (alpha) and power (1 - beta) of a specified discrete stopping boundary for sequential monitoring of a study with a fixed maximum number of patients ( N) to be enrolled on the experimental therapy. Only an upper boundary was u sed since trials are only terminated for an excess frequency of toxicity an d not for a low rate. By repeated use of this algorithm a stopping rule can be identified which has nearly the chosen level of (cc) and a reasonable p ower depending on the design parameters of the study. The work reported her e embeds this earlier algorithm as a subroutine in a larger FORTRAN program which searches all boundaries that fulfil constraints on size and power, a s specified by the user. The search is restricted so that only those bounda ries with size in a small neighbourhood of the chosen alpha are examined an d displayed if the power is above a set minimum. These restrictions reduce the number of boundaries examined to only 0.4 per cent of all possible boun daries, thus reducing running time to a practical few seconds. Many such bo undaries exist, the one with the largest power can then be chosen for monit oring the trial. The average sample number (ASN) and the expected relative loss (ERL) are also computed. The criterion for choosing may also be based on small ASN or low ERL in addition to power and appropriate alpha. Copyrig ht (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.