A series of four reinforced concrete walls Mere tested to failure To evalua
te the influence of diagonal web reinforcement on the hysteretic response.
Two walls contained conventional horizontal and vertical web reinforcement,
and two walls contained inclined web reinforcement. Reinforcement details
were representative of construction practice in regions of low to moderate
seismic risk. A single layer of web reinforcement was used, and the transve
rse reinforcement in the boundary elements did not confine the concrete cor
e.
Both walls with conventional web reinforcement failed due to web crushing.
Pinched shapes characterized the hysteresis curves for top displacement and
shear distortion near the base. In contrast, the walls with diagonal reinf
orcement displayed rounded hysteresis curves and failed due to crushing of
the boundary elements. The choice of web reinforcement did not have a signi
ficant influence on the maximum lateral load resisted by the walls, but mea
sured crack widths were less, and more energy was dissipated by the walls w
ith diagonal reinforcement during loading cycles with comparable levels of
displacement. Analytical results from finite element analyses also indicate
d that the diagonal web reinforcement was effective in transferring shear f
orce to base of walls, especially during load reversals when most diagonal
cracks in concrete remained open and compressive struts in concrete were no
t effective in transfer ring shear force.