Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: Comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings
A. Rieber et al., Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: Comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography, and histologic findings, AM J ROENTG, 177(1), 2001, pp. 123-129
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Objective. Our study evaluated the diagnostic performance of MR imaging com
pared with that of transvaginal sonography and positron emission tomography
(PET) in patients with clinically asymptomatic adnexal findings. An additi
onal goal was to determine whether the combination of the three methods enh
anced their diagnostic accuracy.
Subjects and methods. Included in the study were 103 women with suspicious
adnexal findings on sonography. Patients underwent transvaginal sonography,
MR imaging, and PET within 3 weeks of the initial sonography. For MR imagi
ng, axial and sagittal T1-weighted gradient-echo sequences (unenhanced and
enhanced) and T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequences were acquired. Transvag
inal sonography was performed with a 7.5-MHz transducer head. For PET, a mo
dern full-ring scanner was used. The results of diagnostic imaging techniqu
es were first evaluated separately, and reviewers were blinded to the resul
ts of other methods. Finally, a second session resulted in a consensus diag
nosis based on the findings of all three methods. Results of histology were
considered the gold standard.
Results. Histology revealed 12 malignant and 91 benign ovarian tumors. The
following data were calculated for MR imaging, transvaginal sonography, PET
, and consensus diagnosis: sensitivities, 83%, 92%, 58%, 92%; specificities
, 84%, 59%, 78%, 84%; diagnostic accuracies, 83%, 63%, 76%, 85%, respective
ly. MR imaging, particularly with contrast-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weight
ed sequences, was found to correctly reveal dermoid and endometrial cysts.
All three methods had false-negative findings with borderline tumors.
Conclusion. Transvaginal sonography is the diagnostic method of choice as a
screening technique for ovarian processes. Suspicious findings on transvag
inal sonography should be confirmed on MR imaging. If MR imaging confirms a
dermoid or endometrial cyst, further diagnostic procedures may be unnecess
ary. In all other cases, a surgical evaluation must be considered.