Ys. Peng, Chinese villages and townships as industrial corporations: Ownership, governance, and market discipline, AM J SOCIOL, 106(5), 2001, pp. 1338-1370
Public firms in a reforming socialist economy face two problems: the old so
ft-budget constraint syndrome and new principal-agent problems. China's tow
nship-village government-owned enterprises (TVEs) outperform state-owned en
terprises (SOEs) in growth rate and productivity. Three explanations are pr
oposed in the literature: (1) TVEs represent informal or ambiguous private
property rights, which are most efficient in partial reform. (2) The small
size and scale of township-village governments as industrial corporations a
llows officials to monitor TVEs directly and to limit their wherewithal for
cross-subsidizing. (3) Strict market disciplines facing TVEs render indire
ct market monitoring to mitigate agency problems effectively. Analyses of J
iangyin data show that (a) while both superior to local SOEs, village and t
ownship enterprises share similar productivity and (b) the scale of townshi
p-village corporations slightly increases productivity. I conclude that loc
al state corporatism should be revised to include market discipline as an e
ffective governance mechanism.