Olopatadine ophthalmic solution adjunctive to loratadine compared with loratadine alone in patients with active seasonal allergic conjunctivitis symptoms
Bq. Lanier et al., Olopatadine ophthalmic solution adjunctive to loratadine compared with loratadine alone in patients with active seasonal allergic conjunctivitis symptoms, ANN ALLER A, 86(6), 2001, pp. 641-648
Background: Olopatadine ophthalmic solution 0.1% (Patanol, Alcon Laboratori
es, Fort Woth, TX) is approved for the treatment of the signs and symptoms
of allergic conjunctivitis. Loratadine 10 mg (Claritin, Schering-Plough, Ma
dison, NJ) is a nonsedating oral antihistamine approved for the treatment o
f the signs and symptoms of allergic rhinitis.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of olopatadine used adjunctively with lo
ratadine versus loratadine alone in patients with seasonal allergic conjunc
tivitis.
Methods: This three-center, observer-masked, treatment-controlled, randomiz
ed, parallel-group study involved patients aged 7 to 74 years with seasonal
allergic conjunctivitis. Patients were treated for 7 days with either olop
atadine twice daily adjunctive to loratadine once daily or only loratadine
once daily. Efficacy variables (ocular itching and redness, physician's imp
ression, patient's impression, patient diary ratings of ocular redness and
itching), and safety parameters were evaluated during the screening visit a
nd on days 0, 3, and 7. Patients completed the rhinoconjunctivitis quality
of life questionnaire on days 0 and 7.
Results: Ninety-four patients: received study drug. Patients receiving olop
atadine twice daily in addition to loratadine once daily exhibited less ocu
lar itching (P = 0.0436) and rated their ocular condition as more improved
compared with those receiving loratadine alone (P < 0.0022). Twenty minutes
after initial dosing, olopatadine plus loratadine relieved ocular itching
and redness significantly better than loratadine alone (P = 0.001). Both tr
eatment groups showed clinically meaningful improvements in overall quality
of life in all but one of the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life question
naire domains. Overall, and in most domains, olopatadine plus loratadine al
so provided significantly better (P < 0.05) quality of life than loratadine
alone at day 7.
Conclusions: Compared with loratadine alone, olopatadine adjunctive to lora
tadine provides greater relief of ocular itching and redness, a better dual
ity of life, and is well tolerated in patients with seasonal allergic conju
nctivitis.