Western models of welfare services and professional training have exerted c
onsiderable influence worldwide. In countries such as Hong Kong, these form
s have persisted despite arguments for indigenisation of practice and socia
l work education. A comparative analysis of fieldwork instruction in Hong K
ong and England nevertheless reveals some differences, which warrant furthe
r study as a means to improve field learning in both places. Fieldwork prac
tice is recognised as a core element in social work education. This paper c
onsiders five aspects namely, organisational arrangements in placement prov
ision; partnerships between academic institutions and welfare agencies; ass
essment principles; the rules of fieldwork instructors; and anti-discrimina
tory practice. While the influence of western norms and values on Hung Kong
's social work education generally Should be subject to careful scrutiny, i
t is possible to derive valuable learning from cross-cultural analyses whic
h should be the focus of further research.