Graft outcome - Improved efficiency of remission induction facilitates autologous BMT harvesting and improves overall survival in adults with AML: 108 patients treated at a single institution
F. Isnard et al., Graft outcome - Improved efficiency of remission induction facilitates autologous BMT harvesting and improves overall survival in adults with AML: 108 patients treated at a single institution, BONE MAR TR, 27(10), 2001, pp. 1045-1052
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
A hundred and eight patients less than 60 years old with de novo acute myel
oid leukemia were treated between 1982 and 1994 by protocols including fina
l intensification with a transplant using autologous bone marrow purged by
mafosfamide in first remission in the absence of an HLA-matched sibling don
or available for allograft. From 1989, we attempted to improve tumor contro
l by using high-dose anthracyclines in induction, by increasing from one to
two the number of consolidation courses pre-transplant and by introducing
intermediate doses of cytarabine in the first consolidation course. The CR
rate was 77% (33/43) before 1989 and 90% (59/65) after 1989 (P = 0.06), For
ty-five out of the 59 patients (76%) who achieved CR after 1989 could under
go bone marrow grafting in CR1 vs 16/33 (48%) before 1989 (P = 0.01), In sp
ite of the higher proportion of patients above 50 years after 1989 (32%) to
xicity was mild and an adequate graft was obtained more frequently after on
e collection. The principal factor relating to improvement in graft feasibi
lity was the post-1989 modification of induction and consolidation regimens
. This improvement in graft feasibility was associated with a better diseas
e-free survival (DFS) (48 +/-7% vs 32 +/- 8%, P = 0.04) and overall surviva
l (OS) (53 +/- 6% vs 30 +/- 7%, P = 0.007) at 5 years, By multivariate anal
ysis four factors were associated with overall survival (OS): karyotype, wh
ite blood cell count at diagnosis, treatment regimen and bone marrow grafti
ng in CR1, This global approach should be prospectively compared with inten
sive chemotherapy.