Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury

Citation
M. Dennis et al., Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury, BRAIN LANG, 78(1), 2001, pp. 1-16
Citations number
81
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
ISSN journal
0093934X → ACNP
Volume
78
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1 - 16
Database
ISI
SICI code
0093-934X(200107)78:1<1:UOLTIC>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Children with closed head injury (CHI) have semantic-pragmatic language pro blems that include difficulty in understanding and producing both literal a nd nonliteral statements. For example, they are relatively insensitive to s ome of the social messages in nonstandard communication as well as to words that code distinctions among mental states. This suggests that they may ha ve difficulty with comprehension tasks involving first- and second-order in tentionality, such as those involved in understanding irony and deception. We studied how 6- to 15-year-old children, typically developing or with CHI , interpret scenarios involving literal truth, ironic criticism, and decept ive praise. Children with severe CHI had overall poorer mastery of the task . Even mild CHI impaired the ability to understand the intentionality under lying deceptive praise. CHI, especially biologically significant CI-II, app ears to place children at risk for failure to understand language as extern alized thought. (C) 2001 Academic Press.