Rj. Sambrook et Dj. Girling, A national survey of the chemotherapy regimens used to treat small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the United Kingdom, BR J CANC, 84(11), 2001, pp. 1447-1452
Many chemotherapy regimens are used for treating SCLC in the United Kingdom
, but it is not known, in any detail, which regimens are used, by which spe
cialists, for which types of patient. We conducted a survey among all medic
al and clinical oncologists, respiratory physicians and general physicians
with respiratory interest in the United Kingdom to find out. The questionna
ire asked for the number of SCLC patients treated annually; how many were g
iven chemotherapy; the drugs, doses and schedules chosen according to progn
ostic group (as defined by the clinician); and the reasons for choice of re
gimen. 1214 questionnaires were sent out, and responses were received from
1070 (88%) clinicians; 266 (25%) of these treated SCLC with chemotherapy. O
f 4674 patients given chemotherapy annually, 36% were given it by clinical
oncologists, 30% by medical oncologists, 27% by respiratory physicians, and
7% by general physicians. In all, 34 regimens were reported with 151 diffe
rent combinations of dose and schedule. In 2311 good prognosis patients, 23
regimens were used, the commonest being ACE (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide
, etoposide), ICbE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide), CAV (cyclophospham
ide, doxorubicin, vincristine), CbE (carboplatin, etoposide), and PE (cispl
atin, etoposide). In 1517 poor prognosis patients, 21 regimens were used, t
he commonest being CAV, EV (etoposide, vincristine), CbE, CAV alternating w
ith PE, and oral etoposide. 452 patients were treated regardless of prognos
is and for 219 no prognostic criteria were specified. The remaining 175 wer
e given second-line chemotherapy or were given regimens chosen to avoid tox
icity or because of intercurrent disease or other reasons. The main reasons
affecting choice of regimen were routine local practice, patients' conveni
ence, quality of life considerations, trial results and cost. The results s
how wide variation in routine practice and will be useful in reporting and
planning clinical trials and in deciding on local treatment policies. (C) 2
001 Cancer Research Campaign.