This paper, the second in a series of three papers concerned with the stati
stical aspects of interim analyses in clinical trials, is concerned with st
opping rules in phase II clinical trials. Phase II trials are generally sma
ll-scale studies, and may include one or more experimental treatments with
or without a control. A common feature is that the results primarily determ
ine the course of further clinical evaluation of a treatment rather than pr
oviding definitive evidence of treatment efficacy. This means that there is
more flexibility available in the design and analysis of such studies than
in phase III trials. This has led to a range of different approaches bring
taken to the statistical design of stopping rules for such trials. This pa
per briefly describes and compares the different approaches. In most cases
the stopping rules can be described and implemented easily without knowledg
e of the detailed statistical and computational methods used to obtain the
rules.