This article critically evaluates participatory, integrated conservati
on and development programmes in Africa, focusing on protected area bu
ffer zones. I argue that, despite the emphasis on participation and be
nefit-sharing, many of the new projects replicate more coercive forms
of conservation practice and often constitute an expansion of state au
thority into remote rural areas. I suggest that the reasons for this s
tate of affairs can be traced in parr to the persistence in conservati
on interventions of Western ideas and images of the Other. These stere
otypes result in misguided assumptions in conservation programmes whic
h have important implications for the politics of land in buffer zone
communities.