The authors have recently investigated the histologic estimation of coronar
y artery stenoses (CAS) to determine its reproducibility and the effect of
training on reproducibility. The present study extends this work, examining
the accuracy, the sensitivity, and the specificity of the estimation of GA
S. Further, the effect of one histologic variable (i.e., arterial lumen sha
pe) on the evaluation of CAS is examined. As described previously, 20 rando
mly selected Movat-stained coronary artery cross-sections were reviewed thr
ee times, at 3-month intervals, by six clinical pathologists (CPs), six pat
hology residents (Res), seven anatomic pathologists (APs), and two cardiova
scular pathologists (CVPs). Before the third iteration, training in CAS ass
essment was provided. In the present study, for comparison with observer es
timates, image analysis was used to establish the actual percent CAS and de
termine observer accuracy. The results of this study showed, paradoxically,
that greater experience did not correlate with greater accuracy: The CPs c
onsistently had the highest accuracy scores and the CVPs consistently had t
he lowest. Training, however, improved the accuracy scores of all groups. S
tenotic arterial cross-sections with residual lumens showing concentric or
eccentric polymorphous shapes were consistently underestimated compared to
image analysis, while lumens with a eccentric slitlike shape were consisten
tly overestimated. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.