S. Rosenfield, LABELING MENTAL-ILLNESS - THE EFFECTS OF RECEIVED SERVICES AND PERCEIVED STIGMA ON LIFE SATISFACTION, American sociological review, 62(4), 1997, pp. 660-672
Labeling theory proponents and the theory's critics have different vie
ws of stigma and thus differ on the consequences of labeling for peopl
e with mental illness. The labeling perspective posits that because of
stigma, official labeling through treatment contact has negative cons
equences for mental patients. In contrast, critics of labeling theory
claim that stigma is relatively inconsequential. Instead, they argue t
hat because labeling results in receiving needed services, it provides
significant benefits for mental patients. Thus far, no study has rest
ed the relative positive and negative effects of labeling. I examine t
hese views by comparing the importance of perceived stigma versus the
receipt of services for the quality of life of persons with chronic me
ntal illness. Results show that both stigma and services received are
significantly associated with quality of life, but in opposite ways. T
hese findings have important implications for interventions for mental
illness.