The seabed community provides a sensitive litmus for environmental change.
North Sea analysis of benthic populations provides an effective means for m
onitoring impacts from man's interventions, such as offshore oil exploitati
on and fishing, against baseline knowledge of the environment. Comparable k
nowledge of the benthic biology in the deep waters of the Atlantic Frontier
beyond the N.E. Atlantic shelf edge is poorly developed. But uncertainties
should not encourage assumptions and extrapolations from the better-known
conditions on the continental shelf. While sampling at present still provid
es the best means to assess the health of the deepwater benthic habitat, pr
otocols developed for deep-sea fauna should be applied. These are necessary
because of (a) lower faunal densities, (b) higher species richness, (c) sm
aller body size, and (d) to ensure comparability with other deep-sea data.
As in the North Sea, species richness and relative abundance can be analyse
d from quantitative samples in order to detect impacts. But analysis based
on taxonomic sufficiency above species level is premature, even if arguably
possible for coastal communities. Measures also need to ensure identificat
ions are not forced to more familiar coastal species without proper study.
Species-level analysis may be applied to seabed photographs of megafauna in
relation to data on bottom environment, such as currents and the sediment,
to monitor the health of the deep-water community. Although the compositio
n of higher taxa in the benthic community is broadly similar to soft sedime
nts on the shelf, concordance in sensitivities is speculative. Moreover, ne
w organisms occur, such as giant protozoan xenophyophores, unknown on the c
ontinental shelf, whose sensitivities remain conjectural. Past knowledge of
the benthic biology of the deep-water areas off Scotland is based on scatt
ered stations and some more focussed, multidisciplinary studies, and should
be significantly augmented by the results from the oil industry-funded Atl
antic Margin Environmental Study cruises in 1996 and 1998. A predominantly
depth-related pattern in variability applies here as found elsewhere in the
deep ocean, and just sufficient knowledge-based predictive power exists to
make comprehensive, high-resolution grid surveys unnecessary for the purpo
se of broad-scale environmental assessment. But new, small-scale site surve
ys remain necessary because of local-scale variability. Site survey should
be undertaken in the context of existing knowledge of the deep sea in the U
K area of the Atlantic Frontier and beyond, and can itself usefully be stru
ctured as tests of a projection from the regional scale to reduce sampling
effort. It is to the benefit of all stakeholders that environmental assessm
ent aspires to the highest scientific standards and contributes meaningfull
y to context knowledge. By doing so it will reduce uncertainties in future
impact assessments and hence contribute usefully to environmental risk mana
gement. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.