This article suggests that analyses of child labour today should take as th
eir point of comparison poorer nineteenth-century continental European coun
tries, rather than the more commonly cited analogy of industrializing Brita
in. Two aspects of comparison between the nineteenth-century Finnish experi
ence and today's developing economies are especially relevant. The first is
the role of foreign investors in introducing industrial child labour in th
e early stages of industrialization. The second is labour migration, and pa
rticularly that of children. Industrial child labour in nineteenth-century
Finland, and labour migration from Finland to St Petersburg, serve as empir
ical case studies. Finally, the author suggests that new apologies for indu
strial child labour in the past can be linked with the late-twentieth-centu
ry expansion of child labour.